# What unified workspace software works best for a small team that's fully or mostly remote and needs everything in one place?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I am researching <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/unified-workspaces">Unified Workspaces</a> for small teams specifically, where the overhead of five separate subscriptions is proportionally more painful, and where the ROI case for consolidation is most direct. Here are some notable mentions:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/clickup/reviews"><strong>ClickUp</strong></a>: Small remote teams use ClickUp to replace separate tools for tasks, documents, time tracking, and project management. It centralizes everything in Docs and task comments. The availability of a free plan makes ClickUp attractive as a consolidation tool.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/slack/reviews"><strong>Slack</strong></a>: The free plan allows small teams to get started without a subscription commitment, setup is described as incredibly easy, and the integrated Google Calendar, file sharing, and Huddles cover the core communication needs of a small remote team in a single platform. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rambox/reviews"><strong>Rambox</strong></a>: For small remote teams that already use a mix of apps and need to consolidate access without building a new platform, Rambox provides a single application where all existing tools run simultaneously without tab overload. A lifetime license option is available, which is specifically credited by small business reviewers as making it cost-effective compared to ongoing subscription pricing. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/workona/reviews"><strong>Workona</strong></a>: For small remote teams whose work primarily happens in a browser, Workona's Spaces keep each project's cloud docs, links, and tools organized and closeable, reducing the context-switching overhead that makes remote work cognitively expensive. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/redbrick-shift/reviews"><strong>Shift</strong></a>: It is one of the most cost-effective options for a solo remote worker or small team that needs to consolidate access to many tools. Reviewers say that using this tool saves hours per day by eliminating login and logout cycles across multiple client accounts. </li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For small remote teams that have gone through consolidation, what was the tool you were happiest to cut when you found your core platform? Was the benefit primarily financial or the cognitive overhead of fewer things to check?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 24 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The cognitive overhead of fewer things to check was honestly bigger for us than the financial saving. Knowing where to look for things reduced daily decision fatigue more than I expected.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4